Children's Views on Children's Right to Work: Reflections from Belfast

Author(s): Madeleine Leonard
Document Type: Article
Year: 2004
Title of Publication: Childhood
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Place of Publication: London
ISBN: 0907-5682
Vol: 11 (1)
Pgs: 45-61
Subject Area(s): Employment, Minimum Wage, Exploitation, Regulation, Poverty and Welfare, Child Labour, Implementing the UNCRC

Abbreviations: UNCRC - United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, NI - Northern Ireland, UK - United Kingdom


Background to the Research

  • One of the most enduring problems with the UNCRC concerns achieving a complementary balance between protecting children and promoting their interests. However, advancing the commonly referred to 'three Ps' - protecting, participation and promoting children's rights, has been difficult to achieve in practice and concern for protecting children often transcends the goal of promoting their interests. This article examines this issue in relation to children's attitudes to their right to gain term-time employment.

Research Approach

  • The article presents an overview of National legislation relating to the employment of children and the UNCRC. A particular problem identified is that legislation is over-concerned with protection and does not go far enough in the direction of empowerment rights. The author considers this further before presenting the relevant research findings.
  • The data used in this article were drawn from a wider study into the paid employment experiences of 545 15 year-old children from 12 schools in Belfast, NI. The survey was supplemented by focus group interviews with 56 boys and 38 girls and interviews with 15 employed children. The types of employment undertaken are presented in greater detail elsewhere. At the end of the survey, children were invited to present their own thoughts on the issue of child employment: 245 children took the opportunity to provide their views on this overall topic.

Main Findings

  • The dominant theme to emerge was children's perception that they had the right to engage in paid employment while at school. This also emerged strongly during the focus groups and interviews. The remainder of the article focused on this aspect of the data and its implications for the existing legislation on child employment in NI.
  • Just over half (58%) felt that parents should have a voice in whether they obtained employment. These children indicated that they respected their parents' views and trusted their judgement. They suggested that the decision to engage in paid employment should be reached in partnership with parents.
  • Just under one-third (32%) felt that they should be able to make up their own minds about whether or not to seek employment. Having a term-time job was considered as the first step towards achieving adult status and moving away from parental control and interference.
  • Children adopted different strategies for dealing with situations where they envisaged lack of parental support for their paid employment, including arguing and telling lies. Children were found to be active actors in negotiating parental consent to engage in the labour market. The cases described demonstrate how children accord parents with the right to protect their interests but within this broad acceptance actively bargain with their parents in reaching agreement over decisions relating to their participation in the labour market.
  • The theme of the right to work was consistent across 98% of replies for the section concerning children's own views on child employment.
  • The first group of 95 children (39%) argued for the right to work and outlined a number of positive attributes associated with working. These included learning responsibility, preparation for later roles in adult life, promotion of independence, and enhanced opportunities. Many also emphasised that it should not interfere with education, with the most commonly expressed attitude being that education should take precedence over work and not the other way around.
  • Children felt they should be trusted to make reasoned judgements about the number of hours they should work and that this may differ from child to child. They also wanted some input into deciding which types of employment were 'good' or 'bad' for them.
  • Some children criticized the tendency to use universal indicators of childhood, suggesting that children differed in their maturity and ability to combine schoolwork with paid employment.
  • The second group of 100 children (41%) also advocated the right to work, but placed more emphasis on employment rights. The most common response was to argue for a minimum wage for child workers or to suggest that children under 16 should be paid the same as older co-workers if they were doing the same job. Wanting to be treated equally and with respect also characterised the majority of responses.
  • Children outlined the absence of such rights as the right to holidays and sick pay from their employment experiences and suggested the need for a recognized complaints procedure and unions to help promote young workers' rights. Some children emphasized the need for the right to proper information about their rights in employment.
  • The remaining group of 44 children (18%) felt that there should be more opportunities for jobs for those under 16. Working without a National Insurance number enhances the informal nature of children's employment and encourages less favourable working conditions.

Conclusions

  • The children's responses present an image of children far removed from irrational, immature individuals needing protection from the adult world of work. As previously found, work is a majority rather than a minority experience for children throughout the UK.
  • Contrary to the apparent basis of existing legislation, more and more children are entering the labour market because they want to work. The author argues that, to fully protect children, it is necessary to start from the premise that employment is now an everyday feature of many children's lives, and it is necessary to both protect them and promote their interests. This necessitates consulting with working children. Indeed, the children in this study, as has been found among working children in developing countries, held the conviction that the best way to promote their interests and ensure their protection was by enhancing their rights in employment.
  • Ignoring children's own experiences of and attitudes to work may result in the promotion of misguided policies that ironically end up harming the very children they were intended to protect, as in the case of the banning of children from the Bangladesh garment industry in 1993.
  • The author concludes that existing UK child employment laws are seriously outmoded and need to be reappraised in the light of the wider aims of the Convention, which adds participation and promotion to traditional approaches which focus on protection. While arguing for the importance of children's own perspectives, she also notes that taking children's views into account is only one of the factors that may influence a policy on child employment - a more valid approach to determining appropriate work for children is to take into account the views of the state, parents and children.


Home | About ORB | Contact


Disclaimer: © ORB 2001Wednesday, 28-Mar-2007 9:58