Background
to the
Research
- Training and employment schemes became
the central plank of government policies towards the unemployed during
the 1980s and 1990s. The high rate of unemployment in NI ensured that
training schemes became a key aspect of policy in the Province.
- The authors focused on the participation
and attitudes of the LTU in West Belfast towards training and employment
schemes, with a special emphasis on the government's latest response
to unemployment in NI - the CWP. The research also explored aspects
of labour demand through a series of interviews with human resource/personnel
managers of major employers in West Belfast.
Research
Approach
- A postal questionnaire was sent to the
LTU in the West Belfast CWP pilot area and 314 were returned. Interviews
were held with staff and board members of City West Action (the company
delivering the programme on the ground) and some participants and providers
of CWP placements. Questionnaires were completed and interviews carried
out with personnel/resource managers of 14 major companies in West Belfast.
CWP
- The main objectives of CWP were to reach
male heads of households with children and to test a new way of delivering
training. To participate, individuals had to be aged between 25 and
60 years of age and have been unemployed for 12 months or more continuously.
They had to have a high level qualification (Degree/HND), a recognised
vocational qualification or have completed a Training & Employment Agency
training programme (Action for Community Employment, Youth Training
Programme, Job Seekers Training Programme). CWP allowed participants
to remain on the scheme for up to 3 years. For the duration of the scheme,
all benefits are safeguarded and a training allowance of £20 per week
is paid. Other premiums may be paid according to skill level and job
responsibility.
Main Findings
The
Unemployed and Previous Training Schemes
- Four in ten respondents reported having
been on a training or employment scheme (42% of Catholic/Protestant
men; 32% of Catholic women and 52% of Protestant women).
- Just over half (52%) of all respondents
had been on more than one scheme - the majority of these were young
people. Of the 14 men with 4 or more children, 64% had been on a scheme
prior to CWP.
- The main reasons given for taking up
training were 'improving chances of getting a job' (65%), 'interest
in the skills involved' (23%) and 'could make more money on the scheme
than on benefits' (22%).
- 75% of those who had been on the scheme
completed it; Catholic men had the highest completion rate (80%) and
Protestant men the lowest (66%). Half of these Protestant men left the
scheme to take a job compared to only 7% of Catholic men, 25% of Catholic
women and no Protestant women. However most of these jobs only lasted
weeks or months.
- The most common reasons for Catholic and
Protestant women leaving schemes were problems with childcare and other
family reasons, although men also cited childcare as a reason. The most
common reasons for Catholic men leaving a scheme were wages/allowances
being too low.
- Nearly half of all respondents felt the
scheme had no effect on chances of employment (51% of these were Catholic
men), 23% felt it slightly increased chances of employment and only
15% felt it greatly increased chances (Protestant men were likely to
agree their chances were slightly or greatly increased).
- Only 3% of respondents felt pay/allowances
were too high, with 28% feeling they were about right. 69% felt they
were too low.
- Nearly 30% of respondents rejected more
schemes as a solution to unemployment and 55% said the solution lay
with 'more real jobs'.
The
CWP'S Benefit-Plus Scheme
- 45% of the sample reported they would
be interested in a scheme in which they worked full-time, kept their
benefits and got at least £20 extra per week. Women (53%) were more
likely to be interested than men (43%). Only 39% of Catholic men were
interested in such a scheme. 43% of men with one to three children were
interested in such a scheme as were 41% of men with four or more children.
Men and women without children were more likely to be interested in
such a scheme.
- The average premium specified by the
unemployed that would encourage them to join such a scheme was £54.
Women stated a lower average premium of £49. Catholic men specified
the highest premium of £60. All of these amounts were much higher than
the total premium available under CWP.
Employers
- All employers appeared to have high standards
of recruitment and knowledge of fair employment issues. All reported
placing advertisements in newspapers, none reported using word of mouth,
personal contact or unsolicited applications.
- Employers identified experience, a stable
employment record, personal qualities, skills, references and qualifications
as important recruitment factors; none identified age, gender or personal
recommendation as important.
- Nine of the 14 employers had recently
recruited LTU in sales, skilled manual and semi-skilled manual jobs.
In the manufacturing sector a high number of the LTU were recruited
for temporary jobs.
- Employers reported that some applicants
came to interview only to show they were 'actively seeking work' in
order to get/retain benefits.
- All employers said that the length of
time someone was unemployed affected their attitude to recruiting them,
their concerns focused on motivation and ability.
- Six of the 9 employers who had recently
hired the LTU found no difference in their performance and that of other
workers. Three of these stated that the LTU workers - especially men
with children - were their best and most loyal workers. Despite this,
nearly half of employers felt that improvements in the job applications,
skills, presentation, motivation and attitude of the LTU would encourage
them to recruit more of the LTU.
- Evidence of training or work experience
and an increased need for casual labour were cited as factors that would
make employers recruit more of the LTU. Few employers felt that an increase
in unskilled jobs would make them employ more of the LTU nor would the
willingness of the LTU to work for lower wages.
- All employers stated that they could
recruit a certain percentage of the workforce from the local labour
market and/or from the LTU if it were a condition of public grants.
- Many employers felt the LTU should be
given more help to fill in job applications and improve their motivation
- although most could find no differences in the quality of applications
from the LTU and other applicants. Most felt that the LTU lacked confidence
and technique in interviews and this would need to be addressed.
- In general, employers did not believe
that current training schemes increased the chances of participants
being hired or gaining more skills. Many felt the relevance and quality
of the skills acquired were minimal.
Conclusions
- The CWP is underpinned by a 'traditional'
view of work as being full-time and carried out by men whose partners
take care of the children. One solution would be to introduce part-time/job
share CWP posts.
- Childcare provision is a serious impediment
for participants in training schemes and this remains the case for CWP.
- Consideration should be given to increasing
the premiums to £60 per week.
- The fair employment implications of the
distribution of CWP places needs careful consideration. If the scheme
were expanded to the size of current West Belfast ACE provision the
Protestant share of the LTU would fall from 21% to 15.7% and the Catholic
share increase from 79% to 84.3%.
- Employers should share more of the responsibility
for actively targeting the unemployed. In areas of high unemployment
they need to be encouraged by government to do this. The goal of reducing
unemployment needs to be matched with specific fair employment goals
dealing with unemployment differentials.
- Government policies need to consider
more fully labour demands. Subsidies to employers to create jobs locally
should become more of a tool in tackling long-term unemployment. These
could be tied to set quotas for the recruitment of LTU - 15% or 20%
depending on the circumstances and occupations involved.
|