Background
to the
Research
- Within NI there has been
considerable academic and political debate surrounding the issue of
unemployment.
- NI has one of the largest
concentrations of unemployment and especially long-term unemployment
in the UK. Moreover, unemployment is not equally distributed between
Protestant and Catholic communities.
- The aim of this paper is to highlight
the fact that current supply-side labour market policies are having
limited impact in NI, especially for the long-term unemployed.
A number of policy proposals targeted at reducing LTU and Catholic and
Protestant differences in unemployment rates are also discussed.
Research
Approach
- The research project is drawn primarily
from three sources.
- 1. A sample of 314 useable returned postal
questionnaires of LTU claimants in West Belfast, drawn from the claimant
register of unemployed people in relevant West Belfast Wards. Moreover,
the sample is broadly representative of age structure.
- 2. Interviews with people involved in
devising, implementing and participating in the CWP.
- 3. Interviews with human resource managers
of fourteen major employers in the West Belfast area. Of the employers
surveyed, six were locally owned, five were multi-nationals, two were
GB owned and one was publicly owned. Two methods of eliciting data were
used; a questionnaire that asked for basic data on employment and recruitment
levels, and interviews.
- Secondary source material from academics,
government and voluntary bodies is also used in an attempt to augment
the research.
Main
Findings
- NI's overall unemployment
rate is persistently above the average for the fifteen European Union
member states.
- NI's unemployment rate
stood at 8.4 per cent in April 1997, compared with the UK rate of 5.9
per cent.
- NI has by far the most
serious problem of LTU in the UK. For example, in January 1995, 57 per
cent of unemployed claimants had been out of work for more than a year.
Moreover, 23 per cent of unemployment claimants in NI
have been unemployed for over five years compared with less than 5 per
cent in the UK as a whole.
- There is an unequal distribution of unemployment
between Catholics and Protestants in the Province. Catholic men remain
more than twice as likely to be unemployed as their Protestant counterparts.
Catholic women are about one and a half times more likely to be unemployed
compared to their Protestant counterparts.
- Under the current fair employment legislation,
there is limited scope to implement either public or private sector
initiatives to target the LTU.
- The unemployment differential debate
has largely failed to appreciate the Protestant/Catholic differences
in both short-term and long-term unemployment.
- The majority of the LTU questioned were
neither lacking in job search, nor rigid or inflexible in terms of their
wages and occupational expectations. Over three-quarters (77per cent)
of the LTU were searching for work, whilst 52 per cent of the LTU who
were searching for work said they would consider any job.
- Catholics in the sample were more likely
to have A-Levels (14 per cent Catholic and 9 per cent Protestant) and
were less likely to have no formal qualifications compared to Protestants.
- The Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) introduced
in October 1996 combines both incentives and penalties, i.e. the idea
that benefits will only be paid on condition that unemployed people
participate in training and employment schemes. However, studies have
shown that the percentage of 'unskilled' and 'low-skilled' workers receiving
training is the lowest of all working groups. Since these workers are
the most likely to be LTU, existing training priorities are clearly
flawed.
- A survey of firms, carried out by the
NISB/NIERC in 1994, found that 40 per cent of employers would not normally
consider interviewing those on Action for Community Employment (ACE)
schemes for any vacancy that arose. Other government schemes also fared
badly. Even though these schemes may be beneficial to employers, only
one in five of those surveyed used the schemes.
- Results from the postal questionnaires
revealed that attitudes towards training and employment schemes for
both Protestants and Catholics were negative. Nearly half (47 per cent)
felt that the schemes had 'no effect' on their chances of employment,
and only 15 per cent felt that the schemes 'greatly increased' their
chances of employment. Protestant men were most likely to respond that
the scheme had 'greatly' (27 per cent) or 'slightly' (23 per cent) increased
their chances of employment. Catholic men, on the other hand, said that
the scheme had 'no effect' (51 per cent), or had decreased their chances
of employment.
- Employers' attitudes to LTU are not encouraging.
It was found that employers believe that being long-term unemployed
is negatively correlated with the applicant's likely performance or
general suitability for the job. In particular, employers (like governments!)
often believe that the LTU lack motivation and a good 'work ethic'.
- Employers in West Belfast identified 'experience'
and 'stable employment' as very important.
- All of the employers said that the length
of time that an individual had been unemployed affected their attitudes
towards hiring the person.
- Six of the nine employers who had recently
recruited LTU people said that there was really 'no difference' between
the LTU and other workers in terms of their work performances.
- Three employers who found differences
in performance between the LTU and other workers identified poor time-keeping
and high absenteeism as the most significant problems.
- Employers were asked what might encourage
them to recruit more LTU. The most important factor identified was 'a
growth in the volume of sales'. Approximately half of employers said
an improvement in job applications, skills, presentation, motivation
and attitudes would encourage them to recruit more LTU.
Conclusion
- There is a need for a fresh approach to
LTU and employment equity which takes account of real labour market
change and process, and which involves sharing more of the responsibility
in actively targeting unemployed people.
- The evidence from the research questions
many of the assumptions behind government labour market policies and
the ability of these policies to address Catholic and Protestant unemployment
inequalities in NI.
- The markedly worse Catholic experience
of LTU, with its attendant and growing exclusion from the formal labour
market, is not simply unfair but can only be adequately understood in
terms of Catholics' historically inferior and unequal position in the
NI labour market as a whole.
- The role of the employers needs to become
a central concern in policy making with respect to unemployed people.
- New training and employment schemes in
NI are simply supply-side interventions, which fail to
incorporate the 'missing ingredient' required in successful labour market
policies - labour demand.
- Most new jobs go to job changers, and
that will continue unless there are new inventive policies to influence
recruitment of the unemployed.
- Essentially, there is a need for 'social'
clauses in government grants and contracts to target jobs for the unemployed.
For example, in areas of high unemployment, the goal of recruiting LTU
people should be made a priority and a condition of state support, at
least until such a time as inequalities in unemployment are substantially
reduced.
|