Background
to the
Research
- The 1998 GFA suggests a
new governance structure is emerging. The provision and management
of housing in NI is trying to assimilate to the new situation and
to the wider policy agenda of the Labour government.
- This chapter explores the
nature and extent of changes in housing policy and provision within
NI.
Research
Approach
- The authors draw on NIHE statistics and
their own research in order to explore developments in NI housing
policy since the 1970s and to chart the likely structure of future
housing provision in the light of the GFA.
Main
Findings
- Housing provision and management in NI
has been politicised and controversial for over 30 years, and housing
is characterised by high levels of segregation. One statutory agency,
the NIHE, has dominated social housing provision and management since
1971.
- By 1973, the NIHE was responsible for
155,000 homes; this figure is now stands at 140,000; making the authority
the biggest provider of social housing in the region. The executive
enjoys widespread local support due to its success in non-discriminatory
housing allocation, and the transformation of housing conditions through
new build, slum clearance, redevelopment and rehabilitation.
- The private rented sector only accounts
for about 4% of the stock today and housing association stock accounts
for 1% (in total there are 40 registered housing associations). Owner
occupation has expanded faster than in other UK regions during the
1990s and now accounts for about 68% of the housing stock.
- In the mid-1990s, housing policy in NI
underwent its first major review since 1971. Reforms partly followed
the British model; new social housing development was transferred
to housing associations; the Department of Environment's regulatory
and monitoring roles in relation to the housing associations and the
private rented sector were also transferred to the NIHE and the NIHE
was to remain the single comprehensive strategic organisation with
responsibility for assessing housing need.
- The new Labour government has given a
firm commitment that the Compulsory Competitive Tendering of housing
management will not be enforced and that homeless legalisation introduced
in the rest of Britain will not be introduced in NI.
- The government and the new Assembly have
to determine who should be the main providers of social housing in
the province beyond the millennium. The NIHE, as main provider of
social housing, has been endorsed by the majority of the population
and therefore the transfer of all new build to housing associations
is not a satisfactory solution.
- The housing association sector should
be encouraged to continue to diversify and adapt to the rapid changes
being brought about by the political settlement. The government could
consider encouraging housing associations and the Executive to work
closely together in order to promote integrated housing. Housing associations
could promote cross-border regeneration in the spirit of the peace
agreement.
- The issue of funding must be addressed
and ways need to be found to allow the NIHE to utilise it's asset
base and income stream to borrow from the private sector. This money
could be used to incorporate housing policy within the wider regeneration
remit in NI.
- In the final analysis, housing policy
in NI will depend on the nature of any new administration. New administrative
structures, which could include the return of housing and planning
powers to local representatives, will set a new context for policy
development. Given this, and the continuing sectarian nature of housing,
it is important that the government assesses how sustainable a new
administrative system may be, and the future directions it might take.
For these reasons, it is imperative that the NIHE should remain in
existence for the foreseeable future.
|