Background
to the Research
- In the
diverse fields of pay and pay determination, one pattern remains markedly
consistent. This is the gender differential between women and men. In
Northern Ireland women's hourly earnings are in average 84.7% of those
of men. This echoes a similar, though larger, gender pay gap in Great
Britain. This report presents the findings of research commissioned
by the Equal Opportunities Commission for Northern Ireland from an independent
research organisation, Industrial Relations Services.
- The aim
of the research was to examine the characteristics of pay structures
across public sector services and industries in Northern Ireland and
to assess how these characteristics may impact upon the gender pay differential.
Research
Approach
- A postal
survey of private sector employers employing 50 people of more was undertaken
which produced responses from 110 organisations employing a total of
37,588 people.
- An analysis
of comparable public sector data such as collective agreements and staffing
returns was also undertaken along with 45 follow-up interviews with
employers in the private sector which focused on issues of particular
concern for the research.
Main
Findings
Pay
structures and gender
- Eight
in ten organisations in the private sector covered in the research,
organise their pay arrangements into pay structures, as do all public
sector employers covered.
- Nine
in ten private sector pay structures are clearly gender-segregated,
being heavily dominated either by men or women. Similarly, only three
of sixteen public sector pay structures examined are gender neutral,
in that they cover similar proportions of men and women.
- The earnings
potential is considerably lower in structures where women rather than
men, are concentrated.
- In the
private sector, women are most likely to be concentrated in the bottom
half of pay structures whereas men are concentrated in the top half.
- Public
sector grading structures show a concentration of women in the most
junior grades while men are more evenly distributed through the structures.
Aspects
of pay determination
- The majority
of private sector pay structures cover a fairly narrow occupational
grouping and women are disproportionately concentrated in structures
including only a narrow range of jobs.
- Most
pay determination decisions are made at company rather than group, division
or local level. This finding applies particularly to female-dominated
pay structures.
- Women
are less likely than men to be found in business units which have collective
bargaining.
- Female-dominated
pay structures are less likely than male-dominated structures to be
influenced by collective bargaining.
- Female-dominated
structures are more likely than male-dominated to have pay decisions
made at local level.
Pay rises
and progression
- The overwhelming
majority of both men and women covered by the research receive some
pay rise which is not linked to individual performance - an across-the-board
or general increase.
- Male-dominated
pay structures in the private sector are twice as likely as female-dominated
ones to include provision for an individual merit-based increase or
to have performance-related pay progression.
- Men are
four times as likely as women to be in pay structures which allow for
performance-based pay rises.
- The lack
of openness and clarity about criteria for merit/performance payment
in the majority of organisations means that potential for discrepancies
to creep into these systems is considerable.
- Lack
of opportunity for promotion for jobs with higher responsibility seems
to be the main limit on pay progression for women in the public sector.
Job
Evaluation
- The use
of job evaluation appears to be spreading and the majority of schemes
used are analytical, factor-based ones.
- Men seem
rather more likely than women to be in pay structures where job evaluation
applies. This is likely to be a result of the greater concentration
of men in larger pay structures, covering a wide range of occupations.
- Public
sector evidence suggests that, even where a scheme has been designed
specifically to address equal pay for work of equal value issues women
still tend to end up at the bottom of earnings and pay hierarchies.
Make-up
of earnings
- Male
dominated structures are slightly more likely to include access to overtime
payments than female-dominated structures, and at least twice as likely
to offer shift-premium or bonus opportunities.
- Most
employees - both male and female - are in pay structures which make
them eligible for overtime payments.
- The actual
earnings women get from overtime working are only 40% of those received
by men in the survey. Reasons for the difference may include women's
domestic responsibilities and the lack of adequate childcare facilities.
- Even
when women are eligible for other premium payments, these are likely
in practice to have less than half the value of payments made to their
male colleagues.
- The value
of pay additions such as bonuses to male manual workers in the public
sector means that their actual earnings frequently exceed those of large
numbers of female white-collar workers, even though the men's basic
pay levels are considerably lower.
Monitoring
for gender equality
- Only
a small minority of business units audit their pay arrangements for
gender disadvantage; however the likelihood of gender monitoring seems
to increase with the size of the organisation.
- In the
public sector, although basic pay levels are generally monitored, other
basic aspects of the pay package, such as bonus pay in district councils,
are not subject to regular auditing.
- Aspects
of pay determination show a disturbing lack of openness in many organisations.
- While
only a very small minority of organisations have taken equal pay or
equal pay value initiatives in the last five years, equal pay cases
of collective bargaining have provided the impetus for initiating and
promoting these changes in the majority of cases.
|