Background
to the
Research
- Between 1969 and 1973 in
Belfast, an estimated 60,000 people left their homes due to ethnic conflict
and 15 peace lines were constructed in order to help manage the conflict
in areas of Belfast where the two communities interfaced. Life in the
interfaces is poorly understood by policy makers and little has been
forthcoming from them on how the peace lines are to be managed. This
chapter seeks to explore the functions of the peace lines and elicits
the responses of the community to the issue.
Research
Approach
- The analysis is based on households surveyed
in three areas in Belfast (450 households per area); Suffolk in West
Belfast - an area of predominately Catholic housing with a small Protestant
community; Short Strand - a predominantly Protestant area with a small
Catholic population and Ardoyne where there is a numerical balance between
Protestants and Catholics.
Main
Findings
- If the three areas are typical of peace
line zones, then 69% of the community earn less than £5,000 compared
with 45% of NI as a whole. The unemployment rate at interface areas
is 31%- three times the rate for NI as a whole (11%).
- Forty-one per cent of households in total
receive Income Support, compared with 21% for NI as a whole. Twelve
per cent of the total population in NI gained Advanced level standard
as their highest qualification and the same figure a university degree,
in the peace line communities the rates were 2% and 1% respectively.
- Protestant demographics are characterised
by lower fertility rates, family size and an elderly profile, whilst
Catholic demographics are characterised by larger than average families,
a younger age profile and higher than average fertility rates. This
has implications for housing provision. For example, 27% of the households
in Protestant Suffolk were equal to the 'bedroom standard' of dwelling
occupancy compared with 46% on the Catholic side. In Ardoyne and the
Short Strand, 43% and 44% of Protestant households are classified as
elderly compared with 26% of Catholic households in the two areas.
- Low head of household income is a feature
of all areas, whether Protestant or Catholic. The same applies to employment
data, in the Short Strand 17% of household heads on the Protestant side
of the peace line are in full-time employment compared with 16% on the
Catholic side.
- Twenty-eight per cent of Catholics in
the Short Strand reported that accessing monthly shopping was a problem
and 11% of residents in Protestant Suffolk had a problem getting to
a leisure centre. Overall, 25% of peace line residents had a problem
with vandalism, 24% with stone throwing and 13% with local rioting.
- Most Protestants described themselves
as 'British'; Suffolk 60%, Ardoyne 58% and Short Strand 39%, and Catholics
were most likely to call themselves 'Irish'.
- Eighty-one per cent of the sample would
allow someone from the opposite religion to join their clubs and societies
and 90% would permit entry into their neighbourhood. In all areas there
was a lower rate of acceptance amongst Protestants; for example, in
Suffolk 90% of Catholics would allow a member of the Protestant community
to marry into their family compared with 60% of Protestants allowing
a Catholic to marry into their family and 79% of Ardoyne Protestants
would accept a Catholic neighbour compared with 97% of Catholics accepting
a Protestant neighbour.
Conclusions
- The development of a pluralist housing
and planning agenda in Belfast needs to take account of the realities
that have shaped the social and physical fabric of the city.
- Planning that takes account of segregation
can only be accused of being apartheid where it is used as an instrument
of community control, discrimination in the allocation of resources,
or as an enforced strategy. This can be avoided if planning is based
on an explicit commitment to an equal allocation of resources and ensures
access for communities to services and facilities in order that people
may express their desire for a certain lifestyle.
|